Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
orb:geiger [2016/08/06 21:43] jeroen [Sievert Approximation] |
orb:geiger [2016/10/26 22:53] jeroen |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | <note important> | ||
- | |||
====== Geiger Counter ====== | ====== Geiger Counter ====== | ||
==== Sievert Approximation ==== | ==== Sievert Approximation ==== | ||
- | The installed Geiger counter measures only activity (counts per minute (CPM) convertible to Becquerel). As the energy of the individual impacts is not measured by the device, the dose cannot be measured. | + | The installed Geiger counter measures only activity (counts per minute (CPM) convertible to Becquerel). As the energy of the individual impacts is not measured by the device, the dose cannot |
- | The most critical approximation concerns | + | The value which we present for the dose is therefore |
- | We also know that the are 0.0167 Bq per CPM and that there are 8765.76 hours in a year. The volume of our Geiger counter is 0.00002325. | + | |
- | We can therefore | + | With this method, we calculate |
- | mSv/a/CPM = 6.5E-14*8765.76/ | + | We expect that this conversion factor will not be drastically different in most settings. However, as very different conversion factors can occur in certain situations, we cannot exclude that our values for doses do not correspond to the actual values. |